Civil liability for sharenting

Abstract

This article discusses the civil liability of parents in relation to sharenting and their opinion about the practice. We sought to answer whether parents can be held responsible for the practice of sharenting and, based on applied research, what is your opinion on the topic? The applied methodology was: deductive approach method; the monographic procedure method; and the research technique is partly direct and partly indirect. As for direct research, it had an exploratory-descriptive nature with a quantitative approach, being merely opinionated and entirely anonymous. The text is divided into three chapters: sharenting and its interrelation with extimacy; the parents' civil liability; and, finally, the opinion of caregivers about the practice. In the end, it was concluded that, a priori, parents may eventually be held civilly responsible for the harmful practice of abuse of rights. Regarding their opinion, it is understood that parents are not opposed to sharenting, believing they have the right to publish their children's image, as well as denying that they violate rights or cause harm.